6th Cyber Security Conference · with MastercardDetails
Infocredit Group
AML Software

Anti-money laundering controls that hold up
Screening, monitoring and case management in one control room.

Customer risk scoring, sanctions and PEP screening, transaction monitoring and audit-ready case management for regulated firms.

Buying AML software is the easy part. Making it defensible — a risk methodology that reflects your actual customer base, thresholds tuned to your transaction profile, and alerts that close with a recorded rationale — is where programmes succeed or quietly fail. Infocredit Group brings both: ComplianceSuite as the operating platform, and AML specialists who calibrate it around your regulator's expectations.

Capabilities

What the platform needs to do

The functional building blocks regulated teams evaluate before they commit.

Customer risk scoring

Configurable risk factors and weightings across customer type, jurisdiction, product and channel, producing a rating that drives the depth of due diligence applied.

Sanctions, PEP and adverse media screening

Screening at onboarding and on an ongoing basis against curated global sanctions, enforcement, PEP and negative news data, with tuning controls to keep alert volumes workable.

Transaction monitoring

Rule-based and behavioural detection of unusual value, velocity, structuring and counterparty patterns, with scenarios tuned to your products rather than a generic default set.

Case management and reporting

Alerts flow into cases with evidence, analyst notes, escalation paths and sign-off, producing the documentation needed for internal reporting and suspicious activity submissions.

Rule and threshold tuning

Review rule performance against real outcomes, adjust thresholds, and evidence why the current configuration is appropriate for your risk profile.

Enterprise-wide risk assessment support

Advisory-led EWRA, policy and procedure alignment and training, so the platform configuration matches the documented framework.

How to choose

What separates a workable system from a shelf-ware one

Configuration is the product

Two firms running the same AML platform can have wildly different outcomes. Ask how thresholds, risk factors and scenarios are calibrated — and who does that work.

Alert volume you can staff

A system that generates more alerts than your team can close creates a documented backlog. Model expected alert volumes against your headcount before you sign.

Coverage across screening and monitoring

Splitting screening and monitoring across vendors means reconciling two sets of customer records. Single-case coverage removes an entire class of gap.

Data provenance

Know where sanctions, PEP and adverse media data comes from, how often it refreshes, and how deletions are handled. Stale list data is a silent control failure.

Demonstrable audit trail

Every discounted alert needs a recorded reason. Systems that let analysts close alerts without rationale will not survive a thematic review.

Change without a vendor project

Regulatory change is continuous. If a new jurisdictional requirement means a change request and a quote, the framework will lag reality.

FAQ

Common questions

What does AML software do?
AML (anti-money laundering) software supports the controls a regulated firm must operate: assessing customer risk, screening customers and payments against sanctions, PEP and adverse media data, monitoring transactions for suspicious patterns, and managing the resulting alerts and reports through to a documented outcome.
Is AML software only for banks?
No. AML obligations extend to payment institutions and EMIs, investment firms, insurers, gaming operators, corporate and trust service providers, accountants, lawyers, real estate agents and crypto asset service providers. The controls differ in intensity, not in kind.
How do you reduce false positives in AML screening?
Through matching quality and tuning rather than list volume: name-matching thresholds calibrated per population, structured secondary identifiers such as date of birth and jurisdiction, whitelisting of previously discounted matches, and periodic review of rule performance against actual outcomes.
What is the difference between screening and transaction monitoring?
Screening asks who you are dealing with — is this party sanctioned, politically exposed, or subject to adverse media. Transaction monitoring asks what they are doing — whether the pattern, value, velocity or counterparties of their activity is inconsistent with the expected profile. Both are required; neither substitutes for the other.
Can you help configure the risk methodology, not just supply the tool?
Yes. Our AML Advisory team works on risk architecture, enterprise-wide risk assessments, rule and threshold calibration, and role-specific training — the configuration work that determines whether a deployment actually reduces risk.

See it against your own cases

We'll walk through your onboarding, screening or monitoring scenarios on a live environment — no generic slide deck.