Cyber risk, quantified in monetary terms.
A cyber risk quantification platform that translates your security posture, threat exposure and control maturity into expected financial loss — so security spend can be argued in the same language as every other business investment.
- Risk expressed in monetary loss
- Financial
- Threat-by-threat modelling
- Scenario
- Maturity mapped to loss reduction
- Control-aware
- Reporting for non-technical stakeholders
- Board-ready
Risk expressed in monetary loss
Threat-by-threat modelling
Maturity mapped to loss reduction
Reporting for non-technical stakeholders
Why organisations use Cyber Quant
Security teams are routinely asked which control to fund next, and heat maps of red, amber and green cannot answer that. Cyber Quant assesses the organisation's controls, maps them against modelled threat scenarios and industry loss data, and returns an estimate of expected financial loss per scenario. Because the model is control-aware, it also shows how that expected loss changes if a specific control is strengthened — turning the security roadmap into a ranked list by risk reduction per unit of spend. The output is understandable to a CFO or board audit committee without stripping the technical detail security teams need.
Financial loss modelling
Expected annual loss estimates per threat scenario rather than abstract risk scores.
Control maturity assessment
Structured evaluation of implemented controls and the gaps between current and target state.
Threat scenario library
Modelled scenarios such as ransomware, data breach, business interruption and insider misuse.
Investment prioritisation
Ranks candidate control improvements by projected loss reduction, not by checklist order.
What-if analysis
Model the effect of a proposed control, budget change or new business line before committing.
Benchmarking context
Compare exposure and control posture against peers of similar sector and size.
Board and executive reporting
Outputs framed for risk committees, audit committees and insurance discussions.
Repeatable cadence
Re-assess periodically so improvement — or drift — is measurable over time.
Coverage and specifications
Scenarios modelled
- Ransomware
- Data breach and exfiltration
- Business interruption
- Insider misuse
- Third-party compromise
- Fraudulent transactions
Assessment inputs
- Control maturity responses
- Technology and estate profile
- Business and revenue exposure
- Sector and size benchmarks
- Existing security investments
Outputs
- Expected annual loss
- Loss per scenario
- Control gap analysis
- Ranked remediation roadmap
- Executive summary reporting
Delivery
- Guided assessment with our team
- Reporting workshops
- Periodic re-assessment
- Aligned with third-party risk programmes
- Local support from Infocredit
How it works
- 01
Scope the assessment
Define the entities, business lines and technology estate to be modelled.
- 02
Assess controls
Capture the current control environment and maturity through a structured assessment.
- 03
Model scenarios
Threat scenarios are run against your posture and exposure profile.
- 04
Quantify loss
Expected financial loss is calculated per scenario and in aggregate.
- 05
Prioritise and re-run
Test remediation options, rank them by risk reduction, then re-assess after implementation.
Where it is used
- CISOs justifying next year's security budget to the board in financial terms
- Risk committees setting cyber risk appetite and tolerance thresholds
- Organisations choosing between competing control investments
- Insurance and cyber cover discussions that need defensible loss estimates
- Post-incident reviews quantifying residual exposure
Outcomes teams report
- Security investment decisions are ranked by risk reduction, not by intuition
- Cyber risk is reported in the same language as financial and operational risk
- Boards can see whether last year's spend actually reduced exposure
- Control gaps are tied to the loss they would prevent
Frequently asked questions
How is this different from a cyber maturity audit?
An audit tells you which controls are missing. Cyber Quant tells you what that gap is likely to cost you and which fix buys the most risk reduction.
Do we need perfect data to start?
No. The assessment works from a structured control and exposure profile; precision improves as your inputs mature.
Can it cover subsidiaries or third parties?
Yes. Scope can be set per entity, and it pairs naturally with continuous third-party ratings from RiskRecon.
Who consumes the output?
Security leadership for the roadmap, and risk committees, boards and insurers for the financial view.
How is it delivered by Infocredit?
We scope, run the assessment with your team, facilitate the reporting workshop and support re-assessment cycles locally.
Interested in Cyber Quant?
One contract, local implementation and support — Securing Ease of Mind.